Full Version | Mobile Edition
State Journal Home
Featured Links | State Journal Mobile Edition | Local Job Listings | SJ RSS Feed | Generation Next 2009 Winners
HOME |  UPFRONT |  GOVERNMENT |  YOUR BUSINESS |  LAW |  OPINION |  DECISION MAKERS |  WV TONIGHT LIVE |  NOMINATIONS  |  EVENTS  |  MEDIA GUIDE  |  ABOUT US  |  ADVERTISE
  Where to Buy  |  Subscribe Now
Renew Subscription
Change Delivery Address

Home > News

Print this story RSS
 
PSC Staff Seeks to Dismiss Power Line Application
Posted Sunday, November 1, 2009 ; 02:09 PM | View Comments | Post Comment
Updated Monday, November 2, 2009 ; 12:55 PM


State regulators cite Maryland holdup and changes in the economy.

Story by Pam Kasey
Email | Bio | Other Stories by Pam Kasey

Citing an incomplete application process and changed economic circumstances, staff advisers have recommended that the state Public Service Commission dismiss the application for the Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline.

The recommendation came in an Oct. 28 motion from PSC staff.

Allegheny Energy and American Electric Power applied to the PSC in May to build a 765-kilovolt transmission line from near Charleston northeast into Virginia, through West Virginia’s Eastern Panhandle and finally to a proposed Kemptown substation in Maryland.

Since that time, however, as intervenors have prepared their cases, the Maryland Public Service Commission on Sept. 9 rejected the application PATH partners submitted there on a technicality: PATH Allegheny Transmission Co. is not a utility under Maryland law.

The PATH partners stated in their West Virginia application that the Maryland segment is necessary to the project.

However, they have not yet refiled in Maryland, leaving the West Virginia commission the “possibly futile task” of reviewing an application for an incomplete project, staff wrote.

In addition, staff noted in their Oct. 28 motion that changing economic circumstances may have reduced transmission congestion in this region.

Reports due from regional grid manager PJM Interconnection in January and February 2010 will contain more current electric load forecasts, they wrote, concluding that “it is unclear how the commission can make a determination on this application without the updated information.”

Staff and intervenors in the case, including the PSC’s Consumer Advocate Division, currently are required to file testimony by Nov. 17.

But the staff asked that, before all parties invest further resources in the lengthy and detailed PATH process, the commission dismiss the application until an application is filed in Maryland and new load forecasts are provided.

Alternatively, staff suggested that the applicants could request to have the timeline be “tolled,” or suspended temporarily.

Copyright 2009 West Virginia Media. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
User Comments [ post comment ]
User Comment
Showalter C.W.
11/1/09 at 6:51 PM
Report Abuse
If Trail gets up and running, PATH may not be needed. Maybe that was the plan all along.
User Comment
Larry Notes
11/1/09 at 6:43 PM
Report Abuse
Seems that Maryland would need this power the most. Trail power line looks like its going well.

Post Your Comments
All fields are Required
Name: 
Email: 
  A valid email address is required to allow State Journal to monitor comments and track users posting inappropriate comments. State Journal does not use these for any type of SPAM operation.
Comments: 
Security Code: 
Enter the code exactly as you see it above.

NOTE: You may refresh the page to load a new Confirmation Code if this one is unreadable.
 
I have read and agree to the JOURNAL Commenting Policy
NOTE: It is unlawful to disclose personal information, including names, of minors under 18 involved in any criminal action.
 



© West Virginia Media Holdings, LLC
WBOY-TV I WOWK-TV I WTRF-TV I WVNS-TV I Your ABC I ABC Ohio Valley
FOX Ohio Valley | FOX WV | The State Journal | Country Roads Journal
Privacy Policy


Site Development and Hosting By Citynet
Citynet